he news of February 27, 2025, is a watershed moment. The Trump administration, completing its assault on U.S. foreign aid, announced the termination of nearly 10,000 USAID and State Department awards (Devex, 2025d), amounting to $54 billion in cuts at USAID and $4.4 billion at the State Department. This is not a future threat; it is happening now. This is not a pause; it is a deliberate dismantling. This single act, carried out under the guise of “efficiency” and “review,” has effectively gutted a significant portion of the U.S. government’s capacity to respond to global crises and support development initiatives. Humanitarian actors must prepare for a future with drastically reduced U.S. funding, requiring consolidation, specialization, and a renewed focus on core humanitarian principles. Immediate action is needed to mitigate the devastating human cost and to begin building a more resilient, though likely smaller, humanitarian ecosystem. Compounding the damage, the U.K. has now also announced significant aid cuts, further weakening the global response capacity.
Substantial Completion" of Terminations – The Death Knell for Thousands of Programs
In a supplemental declaration filed in court on February 26, 2025, in the case of HIAS, et al. v. Trump, et al. (Case No. 1:25-cv-00456), Pete Marocco, the acting deputy administrator of USAID, stated:
“USAID is processing termination letters with the goal to reach substantial completion within the next 24-48 hours.” (Marocco, 2025, para. 1)
He further clarified:
“As a result, no USAID or State obligations will remain in a suspended or paused state.” (Marocco, 2025, para. 1)
This is not hyperbole or speculation. This is the administration’s own admission of a deliberate and rapid dismantling of a vast network of humanitarian and development programs. The declaration gives the ammount of the cuts.
In total, nearly 5800 awards were terminated, and more than 500 awards were retained.(Marocco, 2025).
This statement clarifies there will be no review. The declaration is explicit, that Secetary Rubio has:
“…affirmatively electing to either retain the award or terminate as inconsistent with the national interests and foreign policy of the United States.” (Marocco, 2025). This action directly followed, and effectively circumvented, a federal court order by Judge Amir Ali mandating the resumption of payments for completed work. The timing suggests a deliberate strategy to render the court’s order moot by terminating the underlying contracts.
What This Means Today – Beyond the Headlines, Into the Field:
Immediate Cessation of Life-Saving Work: The terminations are not just bureaucratic maneuvers; they have immediate, life-threatening consequences. Programs providing food, water, shelter, healthcare, and protection are shutting down now. The “lifesaving” waivers have proven largely meaningless, as the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) starkly illustrates:
“Suspending this work means that 100,000s of people in critical need, from Sudan and DR Congo (DRC) to Colombia and Myanmar, will no longer receive the food, water, sanitation or emergency shelter they desperately need.” (NRC, 2025) This includes the suspension of support to 700 bakeries in Darfur, Sudan, and the cessation of water and sanitation programs amidst cholera outbreaks (NRC, 2025).
Mass Layoffs and a Brain Drain: The terminations are triggering mass layoffs of experienced aid workers, both international and local. NRC alone is laying off “hundreds” initially, with the number expected to reach “thousands” (NRC, 2025). This represents a catastrophic loss of expertise, local knowledge, and established relationships.
Financial Ruin and Systemic Collapse: The financial situation is far more dire than a mere cash-flow problem; it’s an existential threat to the entire humanitarian ecosystem. Organizations are owed billions of dollars for work already completed, with USAID alone owing an estimated $1.5 billion across 2,000 payment requests (Devex, 2025d). The deliberate shutdown of payment systems (Chase-Lubitz, 2025), combined with the mass contract terminations, means this money is unlikely to be released any time soon, if ever.
The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) provides a stark example, reporting $20 million in outstanding expenses for already-implemented, U.S.-funded programs, forcing them to suspend even “lifesaving” work (NRC, 2025).
This is not an isolated incident; it’s a systemic crisis. With legal battles potentially dragging on for months, and the Supreme Court’s involvement uncertain (Gerstein & Cheney, 2025), many organizations, particularly smaller local NGOs and those heavily reliant on U.S. funding, are facing imminent insolvency. This isn’t just about individual agencies failing; it’s about the potential collapse of entire networks of aid delivery, built up over decades, and the unravelling of essential services for millions of vulnerable people. The appeals, and disrupted systems, make it possible that many of the agencies will not see the funds owed for months.
Broken Promises and Eroded Trust: The abrupt terminations, often without notice or explanation, have shattered trust between USAID, its partners, and the communities they serve. This damage will be difficult, if not impossible, to repair.
Beyond the Headlines: Understanding the Depth of the Crisis
While the immediate impact of the contract terminations is devastating, it’s crucial to understand the broader context and the deeper implications of this crisis:
- The “Waiver” Charade: The administration’s claims of providing “lifesaving” waivers were largely a smokescreen. Many organizations never received waivers, and those that did found them to be meaningless without funding (Miolene & Saldinger, 2025). The payment systems were deliberately shut down (Chase-Lubitz, 2025), making it impossible for organizations to access funds even with a waiver.
- The Weaponization of Bureaucracy: The Trump administration is using bureaucratic tools – executive orders, funding freezes, contract terminations, personnel purges – to achieve its political goals, bypassing legal norms and democratic oversight (Byrnes, 2025e).
- The Erosion of the Social Contract: The crisis reflects a broader trend of declining public and political support for foreign aid in many Western donor countries (Byrnes, 2025b). Economic anxiety, rising nationalism, and perceptions of aid ineffectiveness have created a fertile ground for the Trump administration’s actions.
- The “Wildfire” Effect: The impact of the cuts is uneven, creating a chaotic and fragmented landscape. Some programs and regions are being devastated, while others are (for now) relatively unscathed. This makes coordination and response even more challenging.
Strategic Shifts for Humanitarian Actors: Adapting to a New Reality
The mass contract terminations have made one fact alarmingly clear: the system is in chaos, and no one can provide clarity.
The humanitarian sector cannot wait for a political solution or a return to the “status quo ante.” It must adapt to a new reality of diminished U.S. funding, increased political volatility, and a fundamentally altered global landscape. This requires radical shifts in strategy, structure, and expectations:
What does this mean for humanitarian actors?
- Realistic Planning is Paramount: Hope is not a strategy. Organizations must abandon optimistic forecasts and engage in scenario planning based on significantly reduced funding and increased political volatility.
- Brutal Honesty and Transparency: Organizations must be honest with themselves, their staff, their beneficiaries, and the public about the limitations of what can be achieved. This means acknowledging that many needs will go unmet.
- Ruthless Prioritization: A return to the core humanitarian mandate of preventing death and alleviating acute suffering may be necessary. This means making agonizing choices about which programs and populations to prioritize.
- Collaboration is Crucial: In a resource-constrained environment, competition must give way to collaboration. Organizations need to share information, coordinate efforts, and potentially consolidate resources.
- Consolidation and Specialization: The sector may need to consolidate, with fewer, more specialized organizations focusing on core competencies. Mergers, partnerships, and even closures may be inevitable.
- Advocacy is Essential: We must continue to make the case for humanitarian aid, emphasizing its connection to national security, global stability, and moral responsibility. We must counter narratives of waste and ineffectiveness with evidence of impact.
- Innovation is Imperative: We need to find new, more efficient, and more cost-effective ways to deliver aid. This includes exploring new funding models, leveraging technology, and empowering local actors.
- Diversification of Funding (with Realism): While replacing U.S. funding entirely is unrealistic, organizations must explore alternative funding sources, including private donors, foundations, and diaspora communities.
- Advocacy and Public Engagement (A Long-Term Fight): The sector must continue to advocate for the value of humanitarian aid, emphasizing its connection to national security, global stability, and moral responsibility. This requires rebuilding public trust and countering narratives of waste and ineffectiveness.
Possible Scenarios for the Coming Weeks/Months:
- Continued Legal Battles, Limited Relief: Lawsuits continue, with some temporary victories (like the restraining orders), but the administration finds ways to circumvent court rulings and continue its dismantling efforts. Funding remains severely restricted.
- Partial Restoration, with Strings Attached: Under pressure from courts, Congress, and international allies, the administration partially restores some funding, but with significant restrictions and conditions, creating a highly politicized and unpredictable aid environment.
- A Shift to Bilateral, Security-Focused Aid: The administration redirects some funding to bilateral aid programs that align with its narrow national security interests, bypassing traditional humanitarian channels and prioritizing countries deemed strategically important.
- Long term diminishment or shut down of US Aid.
The situation is fluid and unpredictable. But one thing is clear: the humanitarian sector is facing an existential crisis, and the old rules no longer apply. Agencies must act decisively, strategically, and collaboratively to navigate this new reality and to minimize the harm to the world’s most vulnerable populations.
Conclusion: Planning for Reality, Not Hope – And Taking Action NOW
The mass termination of USAID and State Department contracts is a turning point. It signals the end of an era and the beginning of a new, far more challenging reality for the humanitarian sector. The immediate focus must be on mitigating the damage, protecting vulnerable populations, and ensuring the survival of essential programs.
But beyond the immediate crisis, the sector must engage in a fundamental rethinking of its mission, its structure, and its relationship with donors and governments. This requires a level of honesty, courage, and adaptability that has rarely been demanded before.
The key takeaway is this: agencies must stop making unrealistic forecasts based on hope or wishful thinking. The old assumptions no longer apply. Planning must be grounded in the harsh reality of diminished resources, increased political hostility, and a fundamentally altered global landscape. This is not a time for incremental adjustments; it’s a time for radical transformation. The lives of millions, and the future of the humanitarian enterprise, depend on it.
Specific Actionable Steps for Agencies:
- Communicate Transparently: Be honest and upfront with staff, beneficiaries, and partners about the challenges and the difficult choices ahead.
- Explore Legal Options: Consult with legal experts to understand contractual obligations, potential legal challenges, and options for protecting the organization’s interests.
- Engage in Collective Advocacy: Join forces with other organizations to advocate for the restoration of funding and to highlight the human cost of the cuts.
- Document every step and impact.
- Stop hoping for the best and start making the cuts and changes the moment you get confirmation of the project cancelations in the coming hours.
The situation is fluid and unpredictable. But one thing is clear: the humanitarian sector is facing an existential crisis, and the old rules no longer apply. Agencies must act decisively, strategically, and collaboratively to navigate this new reality and to minimize the harm to the world’s most vulnerable populations.
References
AP-NORC. (2023). Most Americans say the US government spends too much on foreign aid, AP-NORC poll says. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/biden-foreign-aid-israel-ukraine-congress-55f9568f689897555559a26ba856821a
Billah, M. (2025). USAID freeze deepens Rohingya crisis, exacerbating ‘subhuman conditions’. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/usaid-freeze-deepens-rohingya-crisis-exacerbating-subhuman-conditions-109376
Byrnes, T. (2025a). Day Zero for Aid: USAID’s Exit and the Humanitarian Reckoning. [Blog post].
Byrnes, T. (2025b). Crippling USAID: How Disabled Payment Systems and a Forced USAID Merger Threaten Global Relief. [Blog post]. Byrnes, T. (2025c). Northeast Syria: Humanitarian Response on the Verge of Collapse – Urgent Action Needed. Byrnes, T. (2025d). The Unraveling of U.S. Humanitarian Assistance: Implications for the Global Aid System and Strategies for Adaptation
Byrnes, T. (2025e). US Aid Freeze: Self-Executing Order Paralyzes Global Humanitarian Efforts, Leaving Millions at Risk. [Blog post] Byrnes, T.(2025f) Market Impact working paper, February 23, 2025.
Chase-Lubitz, J. (2025). Crippling USAID: How Disabled Payment Systems and a Forced USAID Merger Threaten Global Relief. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/crippling-usaid-how-disabled-payment-systems-and-a-forced-usaid-merger-threaten-global-relief-109292
Devex. (2025a). US aid tracker: Following Trump’s cuts to international development. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/us-aid-tracker-following-trump-s-cuts-to-international-development-109177
Devex. (2025b). Devex Newswire: Mass cancellation of USAID contracts raises legal questions. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/devex-newswire-mass-cancellation-of-usaid-contracts-raises-legal-questions-109391
Devex. (2025c). Court says thousands of USAID staff can be put on leave, recalled. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/court-says-thousands-of-usaid-staff-can-be-put-on-leave-recalled-109474
Devex.(2025d). Nearly 10,000 awards cut from USAID, State Department. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/nearly-10-000-awards-cut-from-usaid-state-department-109517
Green, A. (2025). A month after stop-work order, Uganda’s HIV response in chaos. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/a-month-after-stop-work-order-uganda-s-hiv-response-in-chaos-109437
Jerving, S. (2025a). Unceremonious sacking may preview the future of privatizing US aid. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/unceremonious-sacking-may-preview-the-future-of-privatizing-us-aid-109239
LabourList. (2023). Exclusive: 61% of public say overseas aid money should be spent in UK. https://labourlist.org/2023/03/exclusive-61-of-public-say-overseas-aid-money-should-be-spent-in-uk/
Marocco, P. (2025). Supplemental Declaration of Pete Marocco. [Court filing]. HIAS, et al. v. Trump, et al. (Case No. 1:25-cv-00456).
Miolene, E., & Saldinger, A. (2025). The mess inside Rubio’s ‘lifesaving’ waivers. Devex. https://www.devex.com/news/the-mess-inside-rubio-s-lifesaving-waivers-109398
NRC. (2025). NRC forced to suspend even lifesaving US-funded aid this week. Norwegian Refugee Council. https://www.nrc.no/news/2025/february/nrc-forced-to-suspend-even-lifesaving-us-funded-aid-this-week/
The New Humanitarian. (2025). US aid freeze hits Syrian refugees hard. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news-feature/2025/02/07/us-aid-freeze-syria-refugees
The Guardian. (2025). International aid groups axe thousands of jobs in wake of Trump funding freeze. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2025/feb/21/aid-groups-axe-jobs-trump-freeze